| |
|
CalSTEP
Frequently Asked Questions
What
does CalSTEP stand for and what’s its purpose?
The
California Secure Transportation Energy Partnership (CalSTEP)
includes leaders from business, government, academia, and the
non-profit sectors who are working together to develop and
implement a plan to secure California’s transportation
energy future.
Do the CalSTEP members have the background and expertise
to tackle this challenge?
The
CalSTEP members have a wide array of talent and experience.
Never before have experts from the automotive, biotechnology,
transit, agriculture, and alternative fuels industry gotten
together with leaders from government and the non-profit sector
to address this issue in California. Their goal is to bring
business oriented solutions that are politically feasible to
the attention of the governor and legislature.
What
does transportation energy security mean?
It means
becoming a lot less dependent on an increasingly volatile and
unstable world oil market. It means sending fewer dollars overseas
to oil exporting nations such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Nigeria,
and Venezuela. It means investing more in domestic fuels and
creating more jobs. It also means cleaner air and fewer greenhouse
gas emissions. Transportation energy security is achieved by
being more efficient with the oil we use and diversifying the
sources of fuels. All future growth in demand should be met
through efficiency and new fuels.
What are the metrics by which CalSTEP will measure
success?
For
now CalSTEP has adopted the goals approved by both the California
Energy Commission and the California Air Resources Board. After
two years of comprehensive analysis, these two agencies determined
that it was economically and technically feasible for the state
to reduce gasoline and diesel consumption in 2020 by 15 percent
below 2003 levels. They also set a target of 20 percent of
the fuel coming from alternative sources. To achieve these
goals the state must start taking action now.
Why
now? Hasn’t this been an issue for a long time?
Yes,
it’s been an issue for a long time but it hasn’t
been effectively dealt with. In the 1970’s there were
political oil shocks that created lines and shortages. We’re
in a new era now where worldwide supply is not keeping up with
demand. It’s a long-term situation. Oil demand in the
developing world, China and India will continue to increase.
As Chevron points out in its national advertising campaign, “We
consume 2 barrels of oil for every one we find. Should you
be concerned?”
Why
should California address this issue?
California
leads the nation in innovation. In particular, California has
been a true national leader in terms of policies relating to
transportation and society. California is the only state in
the nation allowed to set its own air quality standards. To
date, nine other states have chosen to adopt both the California
air pollution laws and the greenhouse gas control measure.
As the world’s sixth largest economy, California is uniquely
at risk from energy security inaction, but stands to gain economically
from leadership.
Isn’t
this an issue that Congress and the President normally deal
with?
Yes,
but while each recent President has cited transportation energy
security as a priority, their track record hasn’t been
great in achieving success. Beginning with President Nixon’s “Project
Independence” in 1973, almost every administration has
announced programs to reduce our dependence on foreign oil.
Yet, our dependence on foreign oil has grown from 40% then
to 60% now.
Is
there a precedent for California handling an energy problem
like this?
Californiawas
the first state in the nation to establish a Renewable Portfolio
Standard (RPS) for electricity generation. By 2017 the state
has set a goal of having 20 percent of its electricity come
from renewable sources. The state has established a public
goods charge, a small fee paid by ratepayers, on electricity
generation that provides more than $690 million each year
for efficiency, renewable energy, and consumer education
programs. Many other states have adopted California’s
policies and established their own renewable portfolio standards.
Californiais
a big oil producing state. Is energy security really a concern?
It’s
true that California is the third largest oil producing state
in the nation. However, the state long ago outgrew its own
production capacity. Though we get a lot of oil from within
California, the state’s oil production peaked in 1986
and is declining, while imports from foreign countries grew
four-fold in the past decade. Today California imports 36 of
the oil it consumes. If current trends continue that percentage
could easily increase by 50 percent over the next decade.
Policy
goals sound great, but how soon could we expect results and
how would we measure success?
The
transportation energy economy is huge and change takes time.
We need to start the change now in order to see substantial
success decades away. There are some elements that can be more
quickly adopted—such as fuel substitutions that use existing
vehicle and fueling infrastructure—and other elements,
such as fleet turnover, that may take decades to achieve. We
can measure success along the way.
Aren’t
renewable and alternative fuels already being developed?
Only
now are alternative fuels and high efficiency vehicles, such
as hybrids, now becoming cost-effective. The increase in the
price of oil has improved the business case for both efficiency
and alternatives. However, the market share for these technologies
and fuels is still low. CalSTEP will examine the options and
provide recommendations on what public and private sector leaders
can do to increase the use of these emerging new technologies
and fuels.
|
|